Judicial Atrocities

“Law and court procedures that are “fair on their faces” but administered
“with an evil eye or a heavy hand” was discriminatory and violates the
equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 US 356 (1886).

“What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer; a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and

Frederick Douglass

heartless; your denunciation of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade and solemnity, are, to Him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy-a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of the United States, at this very hour. “Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the Old World, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me, that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.”
–from abolitionist Frederick Douglass’ speech, “The Meaning of the 4th of July to the American Negro” at Rochester, NY, July 5, 1852.

Today, this great Nation has a new foil, the American Father, who has become the target of

This page presents cases with compelling, if not conclusive evidence that outcomes of cases in Pennsylvania family courts are pre-determined. See Black's Law definitions for "arbitrary" and "arbitrary and capricious".

The rights of the disfavored party are systematically denied by judges whose disregard for the rights of litigants raises legitimate questions about the professional and personal integrity of the judge. In some courts, official records are criminally altered to preserve the arbitrary decisions of the court.

Judges use their courtrooms as their personal domain, ignoring their Duty under their Oath of Office to "support, obey and defend the Constitution ...". Many judges acting in their "Judicial Capacity" intentionally violate the Law, their Oath of Office and the Code of Judicial Conduct. These judges are unfit to occupy that office.

To paraphrase Matthew 21:13; The courtroom was established as a sanctuary for justice, but it has become

Judges are charged with the DUTY to administer the Law in accordance with the Constitution. Our founding fathers intended the Bill of Rights (1791) to secure individual rights for “We the People” against the tyranny and oppression of a Government which is supposed to serve the People and protect those rights. Every statute and every ordinance in every state is required to pass a “Constitutional” muster. A court that fails to preserve the civil and constitutional rights of all litigants commits CRIMES AGAINST THE PEOPLE; e.g., JUDICIAL ATROCITIES.

"Your job is not to become concerned about the constitutional rights of the man that you're violating as you grant a restraining order. Throw him out on the street, give him the clothes on his back, and tell him, see ya around. ... We don't have to worry about the rights."
Massachusetts municipal judge Richard Russell at a judges' training seminar.

Review CASES that contain examples of Crimes Against the People; State-Sanctioned Stealing; False Imprisonment; Subornation of Perjury; Trespassing Against the Law; Intentional Deprivation of Constitutional rights (Due Process, etc.); Criminal Alteration of Court Records; Perjury by judges; etc.

These cases clearly establish judicial misconduct and intentional Distribution of Injustice via pre-determined outcomes. i.e., cases are FIXED.

Each case identifies PROBLEMS within the judicial system and suggests REMEDIES to restore integrity to our courts and where appropriate, reparations to the injured party. Several examples expose judges who administer Law in order to advance a personal agenda or to act for the benefit of one party over another. Black’s Law calls this CORRUPTION.

"The family court is the most powerful branch
of the judiciary. The power of family court judges is almost unlimited."
Robert Page, presiding judge family court,
Superior Court of New Jersey.

We the People need to demand protection from Government oppression that deprives us of rights secured under the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and other amendments.

America, America, God shed his Grace on Thee ...