... one Nation, under God,
with Liberty and JUSTICE for All.
To report objections to the content of this Nomination, review MISSION: Declaration of Truth.
Hall of Shame Nominee: ALAN M. BLACK
FOREWORD
Alan M. Black, judge in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, earns his nomination to the PACOURTINJUSTICE Hall of Shame for numerous and egregious violations of law and professional integrity. "But for" Alan M. Black, this website may never have been developed.
"Family law" cases in Lehigh County have pre-determined outcomes. i.e., The cases are "fixed".
A court of law has two tasks / Duties:
ONE: to search for TRUTH.
TWO: to apply the truth (evidence) to the law to obtain a JUST decision.
From Truth Tables, Philosophy 101:
If TRUTH: then JUSTICE. If NOT TRUTH:Then INJUSTICE.
We the People have a right to presume that in all judicial proceedings the court will search for TRUTH, and will not distort or alter the facts presented to the court. A court that "manages" the admissibility of evidence neglects its duty to search for TRUTH. A court that alters the record to remove evidence presented CONCEALS TRUTH. The only reasonable conclusion for a court to conceal Truth must be that the TRUTH interferes with the pre-determined outcome. |
"Our adversary system depends on a most jealous safeguarding of truth and candor,” |
Such courts are corrupt and can only dispense INJUSTICE.
Criminal alteration of the audio record of "family court" hearings rises to a level of "pattern and practice" in Lehigh County. Facts material to the outcome are deleted or altered to obscure the TRUTH. The audio records are edited to remove or distort evidence material to the outcome. TRUTH is altered. Tampering with official records is a felony. See 18 Pa.C.S. § 4911.Alan M. Black presides over a courtroom where
We the People have a right to presume that our judicial system is administered with absolute integrity, and that the JUDGES -- administrators of justice -- will perform the duties of their office in strict compliance with the Code of Judicial Conduct and their Oath of Office to protect and preserve the constitutional rights of We the People. |
"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error." American Communications Ass’n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382; 70 S.Ct. 674 (1950) |
We place our Sacred Trust in the honesty and integrity of public officers, especially judges. Alan M. Black violates the public trust, his Oath of Office and the Code of Judicial Conduct, committing crimes against the State, crimes against individuals, and crimes against We the People.
Background:
A person is defined by his deeds. A person who commits despicable acts is by self-definition a despicable person.
Alan M. Black presides over a courtroom where criminal alteration of the audio record is vigorously condoned. Black obstructed access to the audio record until after it could be edited. He conspired with the Office of District Attorney of Lehigh County to obstruct an investigation into the criminal alteration of audio records in his court. Black perjures himself and suborns perjury of others, crimes against the State. He acted knowingly and intentionally to deprive persons of their civil and constitutional rights, a federal crime.
See JUDICIAL ATROCITIES: Hamoui.
Black conspired with the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to prosecute false charges against attorney Eugene A. Wrona, Administrator of PACOURTINJUSTICE. Black filed the disciplinary complaint [123 DB 2004] for the express purpose of inflicting irreparable harm upon the character and reputation of Eugene A. Wrona.
Government officials are barred from bringing charges they would not have pursued
absent retaliatory motive, regardless of whether they had probable cause to do so.
MOORE v. HARTMAN, No. 03-5241 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 09, 2004)
Black initiated the disciplinary action in retaliation for accusations and allegations that he, Alan M. Black, was engaged in assisting an attorney, Susan G. Maurer, Esq., violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. [Slusaw case] In so doing, Black was violating Canon 3.B(4) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The alleged reason Black offered in testimony at the disciplinary hearings is PRETEXT, a false cover for his TRUE retaliatory motive.
The record preserves irrefutable evidence that Alan M. Black used his office for the benefit of Susan G. Maurer in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, the Code of Judicial Conduct and his Oath of Office.
Alan M. Black is comparable to Michael Nifong. He deserves equal consideration from the State Attorney General.
CRIMINALS ARE RUNNING OUR COURTS!
FACTS
Alan M. Black presided over two cases where attorney Wrona represented clients in Lehigh County ‘family’ court. In both cases [Hamoui and Slusaw] audio records of court hearings were “criminally” edited prior to the certification of the transcribed record. Third person Affidavits and Testimony identify discrepancies in the audio records.
The Hamoui and Slusaw cases will be available for review in the Judicial Atrocities section. Both cases illustrate irrefutable evidence of judicial and criminal misconduct by officers of the court.
Attorney Wrona appealed to Governor Edward G. Rendell to convene an investigating grand jury for the purpose of investigating the conduct of Alan M. Black in Lehigh County Court to determine whether judge Black:
# Hamoui filed a formal complaint with the Judicial Conduct Board. When the complaint was quashed without an investigation, Hamoui filed a Petition to Impeach Alan M. Black with the Pennsylvania House of Respresentatives. The House neglected its duty under the Constitution of Pennsylvania, and took NO ACTION.
Further, Black conspired with court monitor Diane Snell to falsely state that the machine used to copy audio records was broken, an intentional lie (perjury) to obstruct defendant's access to the audio record until after the audio record could be criminally edited. Black and Snell become accessories to the criminal alteration of court records.
Black also obstructed the “Discovery” process, violating Pa. Rules of Civil Procedure, the Code of Judicial Conduct and his Oath of Office, failing to perform the duties of his office with fidelity.
CONCLUSION
Non-custodial parents have been irreparably harmed by the corrupt and criminal practices of Lehigh County judges, including Alan M. Black. His covert actions to undermine the constitution and the rights of non-custodial parents qualifies Alan M. Black as a "domestic terrorist" - a criminal at war with the federal and State Constitutions.
Alan M. Black is a “criminal” under 18 USC 242 for conspiring with others to deprive persons of their civil rights, and as an accessory, if not a participant, in the criminal alteration of audio records in his courtroom. See 18 Pa.C.S. 4911. The victims of these crimes deserve and are entitled to remedial action by the government. The extent of the remedies, including reparations to victims, will be discussed with each case.
Farouk Hamoui has been irreparably harmed by the despicable criminal misconduct of Alan M. Black and his associates. Eugene A. Wrona has been irreparably harmed by the insidious, despicable, malicious and evil conduct initiated by Alan M. Black.
Alan M. Black epitomizes the deceit, arrogance and despotism that permeates the ‘family’ courts of Pennsylvania. Black was afforded the opportunity to DENY in Affidavit form each of the above charges. He chose to remain silent. By his silence, Black admits the TRUTH of every accusation and allegation brought against him by Eugene A. Wrona and others. He is forever estopped from denying the truth of these accusations, and therefore stands ‘convicted’ by his silence.
Alan M. Black is a “criminal” under 18 USC § 242 for conspiring with others to deprive persons of their civil rights, and as a participant or accessory in the despicable criminal alteration of audio records in his courtroom. See 18 Pa.C.S. § 4911. Black is a LIAR and a PERJUROR for attempting to conceal his involvement in the criminal alteration of audio records, and for knowingly and intentionally bringing "false charges" against attorney Wrona.
Alan M. Black commits egregious violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and his [sacred] Oath of Office. He engages in acts of moral turpitude that satisfies the parameters for Impeachment under Title 11 PACODE § 11.8-806 for engaging in corrupt acts or practices.
DEMAND
In order to clear his name and to restore his reputation for integrity and his Sacred Honor, Eugene A. Wrona confronts Alan M. Black, the father of 2 children, with the ultimate litmus test for Truth and Integrity. Wrona challenges Alan M. Black to look his children in the eye, and DENY before each of his children that he did not knowingly and intentionally violate: the rights of litigants in his court; the Code of Judicial Conduct; and his Oath of Office. His Denial must speak to each and every allegation listed in the demand for an Investigating Grand Jury.
Based on the uncontested TRUTH of the criminal accusations and allegations against him, Alan M. Black is a disgrace to the legal profession and unfit for office. He must be investigated for impeachment by the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. His conduct undermines the integrity of the judicial system. Disbarment is appropriate. Anything less infers consent and complicity.
Every elected official pursuant to impeachment proceedings may be impeached, suspended or removed from office in the event of mental incapacity, incompetency, neglect of duty, malfeasance , mismanagement or for any corrupt act or practice.
Title 11 PACODE 11.8-806. Grounds for Removal - Impeachment.
Our Constitution and Laws provide for the removal from office of public officers whose conduct includes “any corrupt act or practice”. Criminal misconduct or “Dishonesty” or "Neglect of Duty" by a public officer in the performance of his/her duty is a “corrupt act or practice”.
We the People must demand that all public officers found guilty of “corrupt acts or practices” be removed from office. This is only a first step.
Legislators in Pennsylvania's House of Representatives have a Duty under their Oath of Office to investigate Alan M. Black for impeachment. His performance includes criminal misconduct, "Dishonesty" and "Neglect of Duty" that undermines the integrity of the judicial system. Disbarment is appropriate. Anything less infers consent and complicity. Pending the findings of the impeachment investigation, Black should be suspended from further participation in any judicial proceedings.
No one is above the Law. Judges are NOT afforded immunity from criminal prosecution. As an accomplice and accessory to the criminal alteration of audio records in his court, Black must be prosecuted under the law. It is irrelevant whether the crimes were committed in the personal or professional conduct of the perpetrator. When a prima facie case supports accusations of criminal misconduct, the accused must be prosecuted under Pennsylvania criminal statutes and suffer the penalties for those crimes.
By his evil and malicious covert actions, Alan M. Black is proven to be a despicable person without Honor and lacking integrity. He has earned the title of "domestic terrorist" for undermining the Constitution of the United States. He practices his EVIL with a smug arrogance that Alan M. Black is above the Law;
i.e., HE IS GOD!
May God have mercy on his soul.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Honorable Mention:
Diane Snell -- Court Monitor
Kimberly Brader -- Court Monitor
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Hamoui and Slusaw cases and the disciplinary case [ 123 DB 2004 ] are in development and will appear soon at this site. Check frequently for updates.
Eugene A. Wrona (Administrator) offers no apology for any lack of decorum or civility in his description of this Nominee. Details published with the Judicial Atrocities cases and the Disciplinary case [123 DB 2004] justify the plain truthful language employed.