I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag

of The UNITED STATES of AMERICA

HALL OF SHAME

“INJUSTICE anywhere is a THREAT to JUSTICE everywhere.” -- MLK

This HALL OF SHAME nominates Public Officers who war with the Constitution and, like vermin, commit CRIMES AGAINST THE PEOPLE including JUDICIAL ATROCITIES and criminal acts “under Color of Law”. Members of the supporting cast receive recognition as "Honorable Mention".

We the People must exercise our right under Article I, Section 2, Constitution of Pennsylvania to change our Government in order to provide protections against future atrocious and despicable conduct from within a Government that steals our Property, our Freedom and our fundamental rights supposedly secured under the Constitution.

Public office is a position of TRUST and INTEGRITY. Office holders must be held to the highest standards of Honesty, Integrity and personal character in the performance of their duties as well as in their private lives. Each nominee to the PACOURTINJUSTICE "Hall of Shame" is required to support the Constitutions of the United States and Pennsylvania as a condition precedent to performing the duties of their office.

Every elected official or officer pursuant to impeachment proceedings may be impeached, suspended or removed from office in the event of mental incapacity, incompetency, neglect of duty, malfeasance, mismanagement or for any corrupt act or practice.
Title 11 PACODE § 11.8-806
. Grounds for Removal — Impeachment.

Our Constitution and Laws provide for 'removal from office' of public officers whose conduct includes “corrupt acts or practices”. “Dishonesty” or "Neglect of Duty" by a public officer in the performance of his/her duty is a “corrupt act or practice”. We the People must demand that all public officers found guilty of “corrupt acts or practices” be removed from office. This is only a first step.

On this premise, this site exposes despicable acts by persons in whom the public places their TRUST, i.e., Distributors of Injustice, and those public officers who provide a “safe harbor” for the perpetrators.  Intentionally violating the Public Trust is, in an of itself, grounds for removal from office.

Nominees to this Hall of Shame are persons who, in the performance of their DUTY either perpetrated a vast assortment of conscious and knowing despicable acts, or by intentional failure to act, provided safe harbor to the perpetrators. Nominees may include political figures, custody or domestic relations officers, or other officers of the court who commit acts of moral turpitude that violates Law, their oath of office, the Constitution and the fundamental rights of citizens.  

Nominees to this Hall of Shame commit    Crimes Against “We The People”.

Ad hominem attacks on the character and integrity of individuals nominated to this Hall of Shame are necessary to raise public outrage over the corrupt practices within Pennsylvania's "judicial" system. The injustice dispensed by these individuals is very personal to their victims.

Let the punishment fit the crime.

Can there be any disagreement that the integrity of the courtroom is paramount?

Any acts that undermine the integrity of the courtroom and court records are DESPICABLE?

"Our adversary system depends on a most jealous safeguarding of truth and candor,”
Jones
v. Clinton, 36 F.Supp.2d 1118 (E.D.Ark. 1999) citing United States v. Shaffer Equip. Co., 11 F.3d 450, 463 (4th Cir. 1993).

“The operations of the courts and the judicial conduct of judges are matters of utmost public concern.” LANDMARK Communications v. Virginia, 98 S. Ct. 1535, 435 U.S. 829.

Alteration of court records, in whatever form, undermines the integrity of the courtroom. These acts are both criminal and despicable; the manifestation of INJUSTICE, CORRUPTION and ARROGANCE. All persons involved in the criminal act of altering court records or covering up the criminal misconduct must be accountable because those criminal acts undermine the protections of We the People against the tyranny of a corrupt and despotic government.


… the law gives “[judges] as persons, or courts as institutions . . . no greater immunity from criticism than other persons or institutions”.” BRIDGES v. California, 314 U.S. 252, 289 (1941) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting).

Judges' illicit and despicable actions undermine the protections of the Public secured by the Constitutions of the United States and this Commonwealth and are the manifestation of INJUSTICE and CORRUPTION. There is evidence to support the argument that these despicable acts are organized crimes against "We the People".

Persons listed in this Hall of Shame have shown their disdain and disrespect for the TRUST of the public and are therefore UNFIT to hold public office. Nominees include court officers and public figures or others acting under color of law who aid and abet MISCONDUCT in our courts, some by their INACTION and failure to perform the DUTIES OF OFFICE WITH FIDELITY, others by ACTION which may include assisting in a COVER-UP of judicial atrocities which include criminal misconduct.

The question may arise  “Which is more despicable  --  the perpetrator of a despicable act? or the public officer who knowingly provides safe harbor for the perpetrator?”

Is it too inflammatory to label each of these public officers as "loathsome vermin”?

Inflammatory language is necessary to convey public outrage against the egregious disrespect for the rights of We the People. Decorum and Civility are dispatched in favor of "plain language". Nominees to this Hall of Shame deserve to be publicly humiliated for their arrogant, despotic and tyrannical conduct.

Remedies under the Constitution of Pennsylvania must include removal from OFFICE and from the public payroll, including forfeiture of retirement benefits. Where criminal acts are committed, prosecution must be demanded.

A widely held belief is that there is but ONE GOD who resides in Heaven. This belief is being seriously challenged by those who [think] Act as if there are Gods among us on Earth -- "a judge in his courtroom".

Judges who impersonate God must be removed from office.

Nominees wishing to express discontent or disagreement with the materials published in these pages may respond under terms as specified in MISSION: Declaration of Truth. Failure to respond within 30 days constitutes acquiescence to the TRUTH of all statements as published.

“Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to

speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.”
U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d. 297.

 

Your response must be sent to " PACourt Injustice, P.O. Box 401, Emmaus,  PA  18049" .

 

  <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 

 

List of Nominees.