Coming soon...

Attorney Discipline Case #123 DB 2004

It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.

— VOLTAIRE

DO YOU KNOW AN ATTORNEY WHO HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP FOR DISCIPLINE 

FOR ACCUSING A JUDGE OF MISCONDUCT?

Contact us to share the facts of other cases where disciplinary action intended to “have a chilling effect” on reports of judicial misconduct have been initiated or threatened against an attorney willing to speak out against tyrannical and despotic judges.

123 DB 2004 is the case history of how a corrupt judge and the corrupt “DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA” collaborated to prosecute (disbar) attorney Eugene A. Wrona for having the audacity to accuse the court of CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT for the criminal alteration (edits) of audio records of court hearings and other DESPICABLE ACTS.

The Disciplinary Board carried out the implied wishes of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania which neglected its DUTY to hear the appeal of the Disciplinary Board’s pre-determined outcome. The Supreme Court denied the attorney the right of appeal as mandated by Article V, Section 9 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania and Rule 208 of the Disciplinary Enforcement rules. The sequence of actions (and errors) are too much in concert to be mere coincidence.

The case features violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct and “criminal” editing of the Notes of Testimony by the Board.

The Supreme Court (Justice Ronald D. Castille) demonstrates its tyrannical exercise of power with a threat to bring a law professor, Bruce Ledewitz, before the Disciplinary Board for his comments about the Court. Disciplinary case 123 DB 2004 is an earlier example of how to quell criticism of the Court.

Look for a List of Documents supporting the accusations against the Disciplinary Board and the Supreme Court.